Dear Editor,
I read with interest the review by Hilary Mantel of Selected Letters of Rebecca West, edited by Bonnie Kime Scott, and was pleased Bonnie drew attention to Rebecca’s informative genealogy. Bonnie's detailed attention to Rebecca's family history was, however, tarnished by Mantle’s barbed comment "a ludicrous family tree going back to the Plantagenets." This reflects a lack of awareness of Rebecca’s family culture and the context of the influence of the underlying class system in British & Irish history, then very much in evidence.
Listed genealogical pedigrees are today often conveniently ignored or considered, by some who have their own agenda, to be a form of social snobbery. This displays their lack of understanding of the role of class in the context of history down through the ages. To ignore the context of family history diminishes their understanding of the psychological and social influences of early childhood. Recent eminent biographers of Rebecca such as Victoria Glendinning have no qualms in alluding to her exotic antecedents.
It is known that, from her ancestor Sir Anthony Denny and Blennerhassett forebears, that Sir Walter Raleigh was an ancestral first cousin. She could therefore claim cousinship, if more distant, with the Anglo-lrish Chapman family, who begat T. E. Lawrence, whose contemporary and exotic career she followed with great interest.
Rebecca had an Ascendancy upbringing, and was thus was opposed to Roman Catholicism and to revolutionary Irish nationalism. The opposition to revolutionary nationalism was, coincidentally, also shared by the vast majority of Irish Catholic families, who were of a similar constitutional persuasion in harmony with the stance of the Roman Church.
Rebecca West was proud of her Gaelic roots, including her lineage from King Brian Boru, last High King of lreland. This was alongside the Plantagenet ancestry she inherited from her other, English, antecedents. Referring to such ancestry is deemed archaic by some whose impaired agenda is never historical but rather ideological. The prevailing biblical culture of the day also alluded to family ancestry, such as the convoluted lineage of Jesus from King David.
Rebecca Fairchild, her real name, was part of the Ascendancy class, as were the Castle Catholics with their mainly Norman Irish antecedents. Both held an unapologetic allegiance to the British establishment of which they were an essential part. At the turn of the 20th century such family ancestry was explicit, unapologetic and conveyed not a little pride and mystique within the limited confines of Rebecca's modest family. This Hilary would appear to traduce for reasons best known to herself.
One of Rebecca's ancestors was Catherine Swynford, sister-in-law of Geoffrey Chaucer. Catherine was mistress, and later legal wife (after papal dispensation) of John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster. Catherine Beaufort, as she was later known, and her heirs ensured the tradition of an enhanced feminist and literary court. Lady Margaret Beufort, her pius descendent, was the formidable intellectual mother of Henry VII. She founded the Lady Margaret Professorship of Divinity and endowed St John's College, Cambridge, so much of the literary culture of the medieval royal court can be attributed directly to Beaufort female influence.
It is indeed likely that Rebecca’s inherited not only her rebellious temperament but her formidable critical intellect from her "exotic” family tree!
Yours sincerely,
Leslie Eric Blennerhassett M.A. (Dublin)